Today I returned to the state house to watch the vote. There were a few represenatives who tried to delay the vote and have another hearing. It seemed reasonable, the bill had changed 3 of 4 times while we were waiting to begin. The secretary handed out the bill, then came back around and said this is the revisions, after a few times of replacing the bill with new print outs a few people were saying “Is this the ninth version?”
There were a crowd of people, some young women wearing stickers that said “vote no” who represented the Brown Coalition against Human Trafficking. Steve Brown from the ACLU and Mimi Budnick from D.A.R.E., (both who are in Happy Endings?) were there.
After voting down hearing the bill, the vote went pretty much as expected. 4 people did vote against the bill, but it passed. Rep. Gianinni was there watching the fruit of her 4 year labor finally make it to the floor. I went over to speak to her, and she was not happy to see me. I gave her a card, and invited her to the film, and she said “I don’t know, I am probably represented horribly”. I don’t know how people always come to the conclusion before they even watch the film.
I have gotten emails from Johns, berating me for “trying to shut down the massage parlors”. I don’t know why people jump to conclusions before even seeing the film. I may sound opinionated on the topic now, but while I was making the film I was just trying to get the truth. I don’t portrayed or represented anyone. Everyone represents themselves.
When I did the film, I got everyone from the police, legislators, johns, women working in the massage parlors. The person who I identified with the most was Nancy, who had been involved in the human trafficking coalition and then testified against the prostitution bill. I felt like she was a kindred spirit, I would have been her if I didn’t have a camera in my hand. She was one of the first people who is in the film who I let watch it. She even reviewed the film. Today she blogged about her experience. I think everyone who has been involved in passing this law, either on moral grounds or “human trafficking” grounds should take a few minutes to see what a Rhode Island resident and woman has to say. Here is an excerpt.
I never wanted to be a part of a moral crusade using law as a weapon. All I cared about was legal protection for people who are trafficked, and punishment for the traffickers.
To fight immorality, I would use other weapons– reason, persuasion and example. Laws against immorality have never been very effective, and have often been cover for worse crimes. Remember the Scarlet Letter?
Morality, like patriotism, provides a convenient cover for other agendas.
In response to more raids “Chris” has written this, and I am including it in my blog. It is titled “What I know, What I don’t know.”
I never liked doing the business part of making films. They do call it show-business, and not show fun, so I have to deal with the business aspect too. Deciding the price point for tickets has been a huge pain. I want the shows to sell out, and let the people of RI make their own decision on the “prostitution loophole”. That is the main reason I have held the film release until June, right before the legislation will be making their decision.

Not top billing..
April 27, 2009 · 1 Comment
I guess when you write a story titled “RI in Eye of the Storm in Sex Trafficking, Prostitution” you get the front page. That article can get front page on the Sunday paper, probably the widest read paper of the week.
Today, there was another article “Suspected Warwick brothel linked to businesses in Central Falls, Providence”. That article didn’t get the front page. It didn’t even get front page on the website. RI officials working to to stop invasion of the Asian Longhorn Beetle made the front page. Not that I think the title of the article was all that great. I guess that is just the way the newspapers work.
If I was to give the article a title, I would say that what they should have picked something from this:
Meanwhile, the police have found no evidence that three Korean women questioned at the scene of the April 9 raid were victims of human trafficking, Babula said. Two of the women are U.S. residents. The third has an outstanding deportation order but was released along with the other two since she “is not a danger to anyone,” he said, and has attended hearings on her case with immigration authorities.
After all the media keeps linking Asian massage parlors to human trafficking, It would have been nice to give the fact that there is no human trafficking, more prominence in the story. It doesn’t really matter though. I usually read the stories on the website for the comments from the users.
The comments are great, most detesting the fact the state is wasting money.
Thisisthecity wrote “the real victim is me and you the ones who pay for this crap to go to court”ing
Lets Think About it wrote “This was a waste of tax payer money to investigate. So they give out happy endings, where’s the crime? That’s right it is legal in RI. There are many other things that could be looked into like the mini mart on Main Ave, where they sell pipes for dope and there is a guy that hangs out all day making arrangements for other to get their supply.”
Island said “Stop wasting tax dollars busting these people. Tax them!”
Mr xyx said “Hey General Assembly…. new license fees? PLUS… 7% sales tax !!!!!”
Other people pointed out the women were in the 40s and 50s, and they knew what they were doing. The rest of them were hot on the immigration angle. Everyone has their angle!! But one that was missing was people who believe this is human trafficking, or that the prostitution loophole needs to be closed. I wonder how the comments represent the general public?
I really wish I could get comments like that!!!
Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: asian massage parlor, asian spa, Central Falls, comments, newspaper, prostitution., providence, rhode island, Sex Trafficking, spa, Warwick, waste of tax payer money, wasting tax dolars