Donna Hughes wrote a op-ed in today’s Providence Journal calling the hearings on the prostitution bill a Circus. Why are these hearings a circus? Because for the first time we heard the voices of the women that Donna Hughes was trying to “help”, (by throwing them in prison).
Now I know that Donna Hughes has never spoken to any of the women that she is trying to “help”, so it must have been a shock for her to actually see one. To actually hear them ask not to be sent to prison. To hear one tell of how she is a single mother supporting her two children and a sister. Yes, Donna, if you want to help this woman, why don’t you listen to her. She said that she can’t collect child support. Maybe find a solution to that problem and then “Jul” might not be selling her body to support her family.
I watched Donna Hughes give her testimony. She was up on the stand giving her credentials for over ten minutes. The length of time it took for her to go over her credentials was more than any time she has spent actually talking to any women in any spa in Rhode Island. But what can you expect from a woman who basically said that George Bush was the first Feminist President. I wondered if this woman had any common sense at all.
Well, that question was answered today when an article came out today the Providence Journal on the Human Trafficking bill
One of the House bill’s vocal supporters, University of Rhode Island Prof. Donna Hughes, e-mailed a letter to senators last Monday urging them to reject the Senate bill. .
So, what Donna Hughes is saying is vote no on the human trafficking and yes on the prostitution bill? What exactly does this woman want? Lets arrest the women and not the traffickers? She may call the proceedings a circus, but she is the sad clown at its center.
7 responses so far ↓
nlrafi // June 24, 2009 at 2:52 pm |
Heard about you testifying at the state house with the women – about time someone listened to the women actually involved with the issue. Tara, you’re my hero!
Sex Work Awareness » Women’s Studies Professor Isn’t Listening to Women: Sex Workers Clash with “Experts” in Rhode Island // June 25, 2009 at 8:37 am |
[...] (well, sort of) from the archives of the Providence Journal. Filmmaker Tara Hurley responds on her blog (which, by the way, is the best chronicle of this saga I’ve [...]
URI Women’s Studies Professor Horrified By Tattooed Women | Providence Daily Dose // June 25, 2009 at 1:28 pm |
[...] Endings? director Tara Hurley also responded to Hughes on her blog (which is how I heard about it), and the story was also picked up nationally by Sex Work [...]
ninjanurse // June 28, 2009 at 1:39 pm |
I think she decided that fighting human trafficking was unattainable, so she changed the goal to one she could win.
Michael Goodyear // July 13, 2009 at 10:07 pm |
I have left my comments on the ProJo website:
http://www.projo.com/opinion/contributors/content/CT_nuhughes_06-24-09_AMER5HE_v6.18e5af6.html#slcgm_comments_anchor
Who do you side with? « happy endings? You Can’t Clap with One Hand // August 11, 2009 at 8:28 pm |
[...] wrote in the Providence Journal about “The Circus of Prostitution” and I called her the Clown at the Center of the Circus. Professor Hughes essentially attacks the women she claims to be trying to help. Not only does [...]
Melissa Gira » Blog Archive » On the occasion of being used: speaking back to feminist men // August 22, 2009 at 12:59 pm |
[...] To say I have a complicated relationship to the sex industry is really just to sum up my professional life. (That, and a lack of health insurance.) Thanks to the insufficient privacy of San Francisco blog & activist life, it was rare that I met anyone socially or politically who didn’t know that I’ve done sex work. Now that I’ve settled in New York, I’ve forgotten what it is to come out. So when I prepared my question for Brannon, after he’d taken his fifteen minutes to talk about what an amazing victory for feminists that intensified anti-trafficking laws are, laws that hand even more power and control over to the police when it comes to ensuring the safety and rights of people who sell sex — which the police don’t historically and actually do such a great job at — I was not going to couch my question in terms of my sex work experience. It’s just not relevant. It was also likely to frame me up in a convenient box in which he could dismiss me. I mean, these so-called “anti-trafficking” people actually believe there is a well-funded pro-sex work political lobby, backed by the industry (as if the big players in the sex business, the strip club owners and porn production companies, could get that big a PR act together), that any sex worker who speaks back to them is a part of. [...]