Today’s Providence Journal has an article on the front page about “Minors in RI can be strippers” The article tells of how the age of concent in RI is 16, and that all a 16 year old needs is working papers and she or he can be a stripper. But is this much to do about nothing?
I don’t think it is right for a 16 year old to strip, and I would support a law that would ban the activity, but I can’t help but wonder about this article. First, the police have visited all of the strip clubs in the city and found no juveniles performing. So why this article? Could it be some people got their panties in a bunch because the prostitution law was not passed, so they are looking for another way to pass it?
I was babysitting all day today, so I didn’t get to listen to talk radio too much, but from what I did hear, all conversations were linking back to prostitution. From my few minutes of listening, people are going to try to use their outrage about this non-existent law for an non-existent problem to push the anti-prostitution bill farther. If the state can’t save the women from human trafficking, they will have to save the children from the strip clubs. It is all propaganda, and it is all sad.
The saddest part of this is that there was one girl who was 16 who was both a vicitm of human trafficking and working in a strip club. She had used a fake id to get the job, and when the police found her beaten and incoherent outside the club they brought her to jail. If the General Assembly didn’t waist so much time on a prostitution law, they could have passed the human trafficking law.